South Africa P.I.G.: ANTI-WHITE

Showing posts with label ANTI-WHITE. Show all posts

A genocide in South Africa

To attain a goal through ideology you need two things: a vision for a better future but also a vision of terrible evil if the alternative to the vision is followed. An ideology always benefits some elite groups, and the one-world ideology benefits multi-national corporations that get the mineral rights. The process is very corrupt: Western governments appropriate tax money paid by their citizens and transfer it to elites in the Third World for the mineral rights to go to multi-national corporations; this also frees populations to be brought to the west as cheap labour and our work to be relocated where people live on subsistence wages. Having encouraged wage-slaves from the Third World they publicly apologise for historical slavery! There is racial genocide of the South African Boers taking place as I write and the Western media know all about it because they have agents and reporters there, but keep it from the outside world, presumably to allow it to go on. <a href="http://photobucket.com/images/racial%20genocide%20of%20the%20south%20african%20boers" target="_blank"><img alt="2010 Soccer World Cup South Africa Pictures, Images and Photos" border="0" src="http://i95.photobucket.com/albums/l131/bittereinder/AfrikanerSoccerFanGenocide_DnSA_480.jpg" /></a> It follows on from what was done to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_War" title="French Algerians">French Algerians</a>, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Crisis" title="Belgians of Congo">Belgians of Congo</a>, and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_Colonial_War" title="Portuguese of Angola and Mozambique">Portuguese of Angola and Mozambique</a>, and what is happening in <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1917446/Zimbabwe-farm-invasions-and-attacks-spread.html" title="Zimbabwe">Zimbabwe</a>. All these peoples were violently forced off lands which their ancestors had occupied for centuries. It was done with the encouragement of the US and British governments and made possible by finance taken from their own taxpayers for the purpose. What is behind this? It is what is now called <a href="http://www.bgs.ac.uk/mineralsuk/links/mining/home.html" title="Globalisation">Globalisation</a>, which is a euphemism for the attempt to create a New World Order. African-ruled countries are a variation on a theme of total corruption, and it is a matter of time before South Africa collapses. The 3.5 million Whites remaining might slow that process but the end result is inevitable and Western elites and journalists must take responsibility. The chaos on the railways is an indicator. Locos are not turning up at coal mines to collect fully-loaded trains, and the power stations are out of coal. The electricity generating plants are fast deteriorating and break down regularly, and the country has been plagued with power cuts for the last few years. The ANC is still dominated by members of the South African Communist Party, they are anti-white racists, and they have a vigorous land confiscation programme on the statute books. Farmers and their families are regularly murdered. These things are little reported in the west because the liberal-left media fully support the ANC as they fully supported Mugabe in 1980 and thereafter, and for the realities to be broadcast by our media would demonstrate the real facts of African rule and destroy the unrealistic ideology of racial equality that they desperately need to believe in else their whole lie falls and their lives have been wasted. The dream was Mandela accepting the Nobel Peace Prize for all who have opposed racism. It was awarded to him, the ANC and all South Africa’s people. The reward was to be freedom and democracy in an open society which respected the rights of all individuals. This is the fantasy. What is the reality? Mass genocide of Boer farmers. The genocide is happening on the farms where Boers are being murdered, but not just Boers, Indian farmers are also targeted; the targets are usually defenseless, especially old people. The government does nothing to prevent attacks, so the farmers have begun to co-operate in mutual defence. That the Black government wants Boers harmed and driven from their land as indicated by their programmes to force Boers to sell their property to blacks. These programmes are to remove a huge percentage of white farmers and give these farms to blacks. At the beginning of the decade there were 40,000 White farmers in South Africa and there have been is 3,037 murdered in racial genocide and more than 20,000 armed attacks perpetrated by groups of militant, young Black racists on commercial farmers, since the ANC came to power in 1994. This is certainly higher as the South African government and police, with the world’s press keep it covered up. Boers are often tortured or raped first, by boiling water forced down their throats, tendons cut, burnings, personal humiliations - most perpetrators are protected by Blacks within government and the police and not tried. Now ask yourselves, when did you see this on television news or read about it in your quality newspaper? The idealism that accompanied the birth of new South Africa has been destroyed by black rule yet the rainbow nation is still a fantasy to Western elites. They need to believe in it or face the reality that racial equality does not exist. The dream of truth and reconciliation and the deification of Nelson Mandela make it hard to accept that after whites gave way to Blacks the Boer minority would be subjected to racial genocide. Boers, you see, have not been sentimentalised, are not figures of sympathy but dehumanised as racists so their murder is not seen as important. <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjndWK_65cSwZd8V_CzRb-L1F8UBI-tgX7DXijfiy8MdLm8bYzzXn6T3MjvVK4UQAcLkoQcwh5m9q8c5KO49s9yJMQf-DevBmSlCJ8RRHM831bk6zd3DkHc2MXef1HQr3OHMbIF5dgL-Mk/s1600-h/minerals-gold.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5350906982779802978" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjndWK_65cSwZd8V_CzRb-L1F8UBI-tgX7DXijfiy8MdLm8bYzzXn6T3MjvVK4UQAcLkoQcwh5m9q8c5KO49s9yJMQf-DevBmSlCJ8RRHM831bk6zd3DkHc2MXef1HQr3OHMbIF5dgL-Mk/s320/minerals-gold.jpg" style="FLOAT: right; MARGIN: 0px 0px 10px 10px; WIDTH: 320px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 230px" /></a>The SA government forbids the publishing of South African police crime statistics without their permission. Media crime reports are vetted by the police. The world’s media want to pretend the new government is responsible or face the fact that races are not equal on one hand; on the other, to keep the <a href="http://www.bgs.ac.uk/mineralsuk/links/mining/home.html" title="overseas aid for mineral rights deals">overseas aid for mineral rights deals</a> quiet. Interpol’s global murder figures for South Africa are about double the number of “recorded murders,” the farm <a href="http://afrikaner-genocide-achives.blogspot.com/2009/02/entire-young-white-safrican-generation.html" title="murder rate">murder rate</a> is <a href="http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2008/11/smallholders-face-genocide.html" title="four times">four times</a> the official South African murder average. The world’s leading authority on genocide, Dr Gregory Stanton of “Genocide Watch”, stated how serious the Boer genocide is in his 2002 report. SA Blacks, especially ANC youth, still sing the old ANC resistance song “Kill The Boer”. This shows their purpose. The Boer is just a farmer but the grudge goes on. Boers are honest, taciturn people who work hard with their hands. Their children consider leaving but have no country to return to. The “Kill The Boer” slogan has been ruled hate speech by the SA Human Rights Commission because it incites people to kill Afrikaners. But the ANC sing “shaya ma buru” at public meetings all over South Africa. The <a href="http://www.edwebproject.org/sideshow/genocide/convention.html" title="UN Genocide Convention">UN Genocide Convention</a> declared that ruling regimes killing ethnic minorities is legally <a href="http://www.preventgenocide.org/law/convention/text.htm" title="genocide">genocide</a> and could be pursued in the International Criminal Court. The new rulers have imposed racial quotas that deny work to most young Afrikaners, whether or not they have the right qualifications. Mbeki’s programme of Black Economic Empowerment is called “rectifying action” - Affirmative Action. Thousands of ANC civil servants give preferential treatment to blacks over whites and even browns. “Progress” plans are implemented, fines and other sanctions imposed. In most cases it’s an unqualified or illiterate black who gets the job. Whites are left with begging or emigration. If the farmers are wiped-out the rest of South Africa and parts of southern Africa will be plunged into famine: as in Zimbabwe the Boer genocide may lead to the death of millions by starvation and outbreaks of Cholera. Does anyone protest? Archbishop Desmond Tutu criticised Black Economic Empowerment, only because it enriches a small minority of already powerful blacks NOT because it impoverishes the white minority. His world-famous moral indignation does not stretch that far. People put themselves first when community spirit breaks down and Afrikaner intellectuals want to keep their own jobs so conform to the black apartheid system like the Judenräte under the Nazis. Those who criticise Black Economic Empowerment are de-humanised as racists. Yet, the government replacing 35,000 white commercial South African farmers with blacks is more than imposing job quotas in industry and commerce. The farmers are landowners and have a special bond with their territory. The authorities are undermining that and the SAHRC has endorsed the withdrawal of commandos from rural areas to leave the Boers open to murder and banned the term “ farm attacks” from the SA Rural Protection Plan as it links the Boers to their land and makes clear what people are being targeted, but these are now the more abstract “murders” which is vague and gives the impression that it could happen to anybody. The Government has made an inventory of South Africa’s farmers by race to … <blockquote>… monitor the patterns of land ownership as it implements land reform, the deeds registration system would be improved to reflect nationality, race and gender of land owners</blockquote>. There has been legislation to make it possible for the government to expropriate assets summarily without having to apply in advance to a court. The ANC is rewriting the South African Constitution but not stating what its being replaced with. In 1991 the White population of South Africa was 5.1 million however, as of 2007 the official White population of South Africa was its lowest of 4.2 million, even though millions of White refugees from other parts of Africa added to South Africa’s White population in recent years. Whites are persecuted and dispossessed for being White leaving them unable to afford council tax so they end up living in shanty huts in Black neighbourhoods which hate them because of their race. An example is the ‘Affirmative Action’ policy of the national school netball championships committee - teams which do not have enough Black children have points given to the opposing side before the game has started! This could develop into full scale racial genocide and ethnic cleansing like in Zimbabwe and the Belgian Congo before it which was another of the richest Nations in Africa but is now war torn. The elites know the history but keep doing it to African countries. <object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3S71PbichSw&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3S71PbichSw&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> <object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/X38CW6l-em4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/X38CW6l-em4&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object> The killings show savagery and brutality as most are tortured and die slowly and in agony yet in many of the murders, no property is stolen. This shows a savage, uncivilised hatred for fellow humans that we can not comprehend but the authorities and international media pass it off as “crime related” when it is racial genocide. It will continue to deteriorate for Whites, especially poor ones as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Zuma" title="Jacob Zuma">Jacob Zuma</a> the President is openly racist, he has convictions for rape and embezzlement and he believes a shower can cure AIDS! In 2006 there were 55,000 reported rapes in South Africa but official estimates are that another 450,000 rapes were not reported. Therefore, about 1,300 women can be expected to be raped every day. A study by Interpol, the international police agency, revealed that South Africa has the most rapes in the world - a women being raped every 17 seconds and this does not include the number of child rape victims. <a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdoKI83fP4JEDieHZsnmfamjE_h1Kj6MapBd9uvVVFHJhqK3gQjJwRILRYuAdk-PDxpnEPCC1kC1t64RVXWqJt1mrs0S_ii33mBJ9mJgKrZ4FtQJJwDpxFGn43ZOcFdccveIaWVyZKKMM/s1600-h/child_mishandelde_dogtertjie_gesig.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5350911392962968706" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdoKI83fP4JEDieHZsnmfamjE_h1Kj6MapBd9uvVVFHJhqK3gQjJwRILRYuAdk-PDxpnEPCC1kC1t64RVXWqJt1mrs0S_ii33mBJ9mJgKrZ4FtQJJwDpxFGn43ZOcFdccveIaWVyZKKMM/s400/child_mishandelde_dogtertjie_gesig.jpg" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 265px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 400px" /></a>Interpol estimated that one in every two women in South Africa would be raped. Raping children as a cure for AIDS is a vile practice. The Telegraph reported on 11 Nov 2001 that on an alleged rape of a nine-month-old baby girl by six men in a remote part of rural South Africa was part of an 80 per cent rise in child sexual abuse over a year, much of it connected with the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/southafrica/1362134/South-African-men-rape-babies-as-cure-for-Aids.html" title="Aids pandemic">Aids pandemic</a>. More than 67,000 cases of rape and sexual assaults against children were reported last year, compared with 37,500 in 1998. Some of the victims were only six- months-old. Many die from their injuries, others contract HIV. The largest increase in attacks has been against children under seven. There is a prevalent superstition that having sex with children cures Aids. Police said at least one of the men who raped the nine-month-old girl is HIV-positive. The baby has also been tested for the virus and given anti-retroviral drugs as a precaution. What can we do? People can contact their democratic representatives and pressure them. They can write to the media. They can post on internet blogs and circulate the information round the net. They can point out that western elites are ignoring a genocide which they themselves brought about by forcing the change in governing class. They could demand motions be introduced in their respective parliaments urging the SA government not to abolish the SA rural Commando System and leave the Boers open to racial genocide for ideological reasons. They could demand that it be clear to the South African government that this genocide is now being publicised around the world, and call on them to condemn white ethnic cleansing and racial genocide of whites. Posted by By David Hamilton on March 13, 2009 in <a href="http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/C35/">World Affairs</a>

A genocide in South Africa

To attain a goal through ideology you need two things: a vision for a better future but also a vision of terrible evil if the alternative to...

11:32 AM

Why We Should Fear Western Racialism - The New Politically Correct Politics of Discrimination

<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1U7sf6MplGN9HwNpBlQBlsUZYwis50FOpLyZ8syFYKcDzP8u2L604Umkm0NuGk2Zzroc2vK2to0gDfBBsn7CMHZTbcXfhbqGXufmteuU-LdROoNZbZ4OesclsorJCHNJo92qCyXKmX7U/s1600-h/affirmative-action01.jpg"><img alt="" border="0" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5308666008309491010" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj1U7sf6MplGN9HwNpBlQBlsUZYwis50FOpLyZ8syFYKcDzP8u2L604Umkm0NuGk2Zzroc2vK2to0gDfBBsn7CMHZTbcXfhbqGXufmteuU-LdROoNZbZ4OesclsorJCHNJo92qCyXKmX7U/s320/affirmative-action01.jpg" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 240px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 320px" /></a>This is a brilliant and informative article from a South African writer. The parallels between NAZISM and the way Whites are treated in South Africa (and Zimbabwe) are most interesting. TAKE NOTE: Former President Mbeki was just as much of a racist as the current leftists in the ANC. There is no difference between Mbeki, Robert Mugabe, Motlanthe, and Zuma. They all are united in their discrimination and hatred of White people and their determination, to remove whites from the economy in the same way that Hitler drove the Jews out of the economy. James Myburgh on the significance of the US govt's support for 'demographic representivity' in South AfricaThe politics of the dominant group in South Africa (whites before, blacks now) has traditionally been driven to a significant degree by fear. In the 1930s white South African politics was consumed by the fear of miscegenation and race intermixture. Today, black South Africans are kept from voting for the Democratic Alliance by an equally irrational and unfounded fear of that party returning South Africa to apartheid (something the ANC deliberately <a href="http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=118744&sn=Detail">stokes</a> in their canvassing.)This does not mean that South Africans don't have anything to worry about, just that their fears have often been wholly misdirected. As Rian Malan noted in the Mail & Guardian last week: "South Africans ought to be obsessed by one question only: what went wrong in the rest of Africa and how do we avoid the same fate?" What South Africans arguably need to most fear in this regard is less some peculiarly African pathology and more a powerful and enduring Western racialism. If South Africa is to escape the fate of the rest of the continent a great deal will depend on whether it has the innate strength to counteract it.It has not done too well so far. The <a href="http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=118604&sn=Detail">racial policies</a> implemented by the ANC under the direction of Thabo Mbeki required that all institutions - at all levels - reduce the proportion of white South Africans to their marginal percentage of the population. This project has required racial discrimination against ‘whites' in employment, university admissions, government contracts and tenders, and so on.Such policies have largely succeeded in driving white South Africans out of the public sector - with disastrous consequences for state capacity - but progress in the private sector has been more uneven. The reason for this disparity is simple. As The Economist's Robert Guest <a href="http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110006066" target="_blank">noted</a> back in 2004, "Unlike private companies, the government finds it easy to hire by race rather than merit, because it has no competitors and cannot go bust. This is nice for the blacks it employs, but less good for the much larger number who depend on the state for health care, water, roads and pensions. The state does not even try to deliver these services cost-effectively." Before their defeat at Polokwane the Mbeki-ites were planning to pass an <a href="http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71639?oid=102096&sn=Detail">Expropriation Bill</a> the main purpose of which was (again) to reduce ‘white ownership' of the economy and commercial agricultural to that group's proportion of the population.There were always two powerful grounds for objecting to the Mbeki-ite racial agenda. The first is that there have been many other countries in Africa where such ‘Africanisation' measures have been implemented; and the economic consequences have invariably been disastrous for black and non-black alike. The second is that the principle being applied - that of ‘demographic representivity' - has an impeccably racist European pedigree.This idea, that it is unacceptable for a racial minority to take up a share of any centre of power or influence greater than its proportion of the population, was central to European anti-Semitism in the 1930s. For a minority to excel beyond the limits of its demographic confines was regarded as abnormal, intolerable, and a product purely of the exploitation of others. This principle was invoked by the NSDAP in Germany in their anti-Jewish propaganda in 1934 (see <a href="http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71639?oid=119229&sn=Detail">here</a>) and it subsequently spread across Europe. Its influence even extended down to the southern tip of Africa. One convert, at least for a while, was the editor of Die Transvaler, Hendrik Verwoerd (see <a href="http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71656?oid=87773&sn=Detail">here</a> for his 1937 treatise on the topic). In 1938 - under pressure from Nazi Germany - Hungary passed the "first Jewish law" to correct the problem of Jewish ‘dominance' of the economy and professions. The provisions of which <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=5_OXOwvjqjwC&pg=PA116&lpg=PA116&dq=%22%E2%80%9CIndustrial+and+commercial+undertakings+and+banking+houses+employing+more+than+ten+persons%22&source=bl&ots=Igb3YR5epl&sig=szu6jNIo6bgDMzf5R47m0S3ResI&hl=en&ei=cBOnSdCoKqKHjAfXm" target="_blank">were as follows</a>:"Industrial and commercial undertakings and banking houses employing more than ten persons are given five, or in certain years ten, years in which to adjust the proportion of employees and of salaries, bonuses and so on, to conform with the general rule that does not allow the Jewish share under any of these headings to exceed twenty percent of the total. In chambers of industry and commerce and in the legal, medical, and engineering professions, new Jewish members will be admitted at the rate of only five percent, until the Jewish population is reduced to the limit of twenty percent."Similar legislation was passed in Slovakia in 1939. One aim of this law was, an American diplomat noted at the time, to limit Jewish "participation in the free professions....The problems connected with the role of the Jews in the medical profession, with Jewish predominance in business and finance, and with Jewish ownership of land still remain for future legislative treatment."Having excluded Jews from public service in a statute 1940, in 1941 Vichy France passed another to settle "the role it is appropriate" for Jews to play in their "private activity in the national economy." One history of the period <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Q7ORlIpHKLEC&pg=PA145&vq=quotas&dq=%22his+plan+would+further+eliminate+the+specific+and+understandable%22&source=gbs_search_s&cad=0#PPA98,M1" target="_blank">describes how</a> a "massive purge of Jews from the liberal professions, commerce, the crafts, and industry" followed. "The first statute had promised to impose a numerus clausus in the liberal professions; this project was now implemented by a veritable assembly-line production of decrees of application between June and December 1941. Jews were limited to 2 percent of one profession after another - medicine, law, pharmacy, and so on: and Jews were limited as students to 3 percent in institutions of higher education."It was not just those living under Nazi occupation who had become obsessed with the ‘Jewish question.' Following the liberation of French North Africa the allied leaders met at Casablanca in January 1943. According to an official account of the meeting US President Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed that "the number of Jews engaged in the practice of the professions (law, medicine, etc.) should be definitely limited to the percentage that the Jewish population in North Africa bears to the whole of the North African population." The aim of Roosevelt's plan was, apparently, to "further eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany, namely, that while they represented a small part of the population over fifty percent of the lawyers, doctors, school teachers, college professors, etc. in Germany were Jews."The defeat of Nazi Germany, the discovery of the extermination camps, and (perhaps) the establishment of the state of Israel, all worked to discredit such anti-Semitism post 1945. Yet, although Jews were no longer regarded as a legitimate target ‘demographic representivity' endured as a Western ideal. This old anti-Semitic principle proceeded to be heated up and dished out to one productive racial minority after another in Africa following the retreat of Empire. This was usually done with the encouragement and connivance of much Western intellectual opinion. It was moreover Western educated African nationalists like Robert Mugabe - black white racists - who were the most ruthless advocates of this doctrine. Thus, although the targets have shifted over the years, this particular strand of Western racialism has endured up to today.There was an illustration earlier this week of how powerful and accepted it remains in the West. Every year the US Department of State publishes its <a href="http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/" target="_blank">country reports</a> on human rights practices. Each report has a section covering the issue of discrimination - if any - against "national/racial/ethnic minorities" in that country. Presumably, the intention is that if the government of a particular nation deprives citizens of a minority group of the right to equal treatment - and discriminates against them - this should be flagged as an issue of concern.However, in the country report on South Africa <a href="http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2008/af/119025.htm" target="_blank">published</a> on Wednesday this week this is all turned on its head. The relevant section notes, accurately if somewhat euphemistically, that "the law requires employers with 50 or more employees to ensure" that those "legally defined as ‘Blacks' (including ‘Africans,' ‘Colored,' and ‘Asians,' and collectively constituting more than 90 percent [sic] of the country's population) are represented adequately at all levels of the workforce." In other words, the ‘white' share should ideally not be allowed to exceed ten percent of the total. Yet far from seeing the application of this principle as in any way problematic the report makes clear that it regards such "antidiscrimination legislation" (!) as necessary and desirable.Indeed, it is the continued ‘overrepresentation' of the white minority in the higher activities of the economy is seen as the problem - not the discriminatory measures being used to displace them (or the deleterious consequences that result). According to the report's moral narrative government efforts to push the white minority out of private sector employ have not proceeded fast or far enough. Notwithstanding this legislation, it states, the Department of Labour's 2007 Employment Equity Analysis "reported that Blacks remained underrepresented, particularly at the professional and managerial levels. According to the report, only 22.2 percent of top management positions, and approximately 36.5 percent of professional positions, were held by Blacks, and Black women remained by far the most disadvantaged group in number and quality of management or skilled jobs."The report predictably makes no mention of <a href="http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=107983&sn=Detail">the purge</a> of non-black South Africans from state employment throughout the Mbeki-era, or the <a href="http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=86906&sn=Detail">racial quotas</a> that have been applied in the universities during the same period. One could of course dismiss this report of being of little consequence. But this would be a mistake. Those South Africans opposed to racial discrimination in the apartheid era, and who believed in a basic community of interests between black and white, could always look to Western opinion for external moral and intellectual affirmation. Clearly, no such luxury exists today.

Why We Should Fear Western Racialism - The New Politically Correct Politics of Discrimination

This is a brilliant and informative article from a South African writer. The parallels between NAZISM and the way Whites are treated in Sout...

8:36 AM

South Africa P.I.G.

A genocide in South Africa

Why We Should Fear Western Racialism - The New Politically Correct Politics of Discrimination

Popular Posts

Blog Archive